
First, I see a teaching opportunity when a book like this comes to market. The reality is that few youth groups teach on the canon of scripture and how we got the Bible that we use today. When a student discovers that there are other so called gospels out there which are not in our Bible, it tends to call into question the authenticity of or the credibility of the Bible if (and only if) students don’t understand how we got the Bible we study today. We ought to teach students how the scriptures were canonized and the whole history surrounding that if we want them to view the Bible as reliable.
Second, I see an opportunity to help students develop critical thinking skills (or a more PC way to state that might be evaluative thinking skills). This book gives a simple opportunity for that. Despite the claim of a lost gospel, it is easy to point out that the book is neither about a gospel nor a lost text. The manuscript the book is based on has been known to scholars for years, it is not a gospel account but rather a story, and Jesus is not in it. The writers are reading the manuscript as an allegory about Jesus and Mary Magdalene but neither are mentioned.
Third, we can use such opportunities to help students understand that everything we need to know about Jesus has been revealed to us and can be found in the Bible that we have today. So, we have a chance here to affirm the authenticity of the Bible and help students gain a perspective that it is reliable and sufficient. We can help students see that the gospel is not about some ancient writing but is the good news of Jesus’ death and resurrection, it is God’s redemptive plan being fulfilled, it is the truth of God…
The blog post that my thoughts came out of his here.
Please follow and like us:
Leave a Reply